User talk:JT EOD

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! clpo13_(talk) 22:38, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Ladapo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I did provide a reason for the edit. The comments cited are out of context, or they’re unsubstantiated allegations.

I’m also a primary source, as I work for the department of health. JT EOD (talk) 15:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Francis W. Parker School (Chicago), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. It is curious that you used comments taken out of context as a defence for your actions last year, and this year, you are trying to use a video from a source known for deceptive editing to add information to an article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Francis W. Parker School (Chicago). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the person saying it themselves. You’re just uncomfortable with facts, and that is why Larry Sanger tells people not to trust this website. JT EOD (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source is not the person themselves. The source is a video, which is an extremely high likelihood of having been manipulated. The reputation of the publisher outweighs the alleged content of the video. —C.Fred (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And of course you have pronouns in your bio. JT EOD (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content stands on its own without your bias. JT EOD (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll make sure to revisit this tomorrow when the school releases a statement saying they put their Dean of Students on leave pending an investigation. JT EOD (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, once sources with a reputation for editorial oversight report on the matter—once we have reliable secondary sources to cite—then there will be something on which to base an edit. When all that's out there is a retweeted PV video...that's nothing usable per Wikipedia standards. —C.Fred (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Orange Mike | Talk 04:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hey. Looks like the school says the video shows a member of their staff. https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1600705953800024067?s=46&t=17je72J-cE2jD_l7RBQC1A JT EOD (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of that Tweet is also Project Veritas, who is not reliable. Nothing that arises from PV may be used on Wikipedia, period. —C.Fred (talk) 17:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]